Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Radical NGO Discourse on Bacon Double Cheeseburgers

Homemade Bacon Double Quarter Pounder With Cheese

Two French and obviously vegetarian economists, Romain Espinosa and  Nicolas Treich, conclude that NGO portrayal of social issues as all-or-nothing propositions — “radical discourse” — generally undermines the goal of changing hearts and minds.  That makes intuitive sense, of course.  Here is an abstract of a paper entitled “Moderate vs. Radical NGOs:” 

NGOs often vary in terms of how radical they are. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of NGO discourses in bringing about social change. We focus on animal advocacy: welfarist NGOs primarily seek to improve the conditions in which animals are raised and reduce meat consumption, while abolitionist NGOs categorically reject animal use and call for a vegan society. We design an experiment to study the respective impact of welfarist and abolitionist discourses on participants’ beliefs regarding pro-meat justifications and their actions, namely their propensity to engage in the short-run in animal welfare (charity donation, petition against intensive farming) and plant-based diets (subscription to a newsletter promoting plant-based diets, petition supporting vegetarian meals). We first show that both welfarist and abolitionist discourses significantly undermine participants’ pro-meat justifications. Second, the welfarist discourse does not significantly affect participants’ actions, while we detect a potential backlash effect of the abolitionist discourse. We show that the NGOs’ positive standard effect on actions through the change in beliefs is outweighed by a negative behavioral response to the discourses (reactance effect). Last, greater public-good contributions are associated with greater engagement in animal welfare in the presence of an NGO discourse.

All I know is that it’s just hard to resist a bacon double cheeseburger on a toasted bun.  Yes sir buddy.  And the researchers’ conclusion is applicable to most things, I expect.  People prefer advocacy served with a side dish of nuance.  

 

darryll k. jones