Jacob et al., Systemic electioneering from the evangelical pulpit: Evidence from a computational analysis
Marc S. Jacob (University of Notre Dame), Yphtach Lelkes (University of Pennsylvania), Samuel Wolken (University of Pennsylvania), and Sean J. Westwood (Dartmouth College) have published Systemic electioneering from the evangelical pulpit: Evidence from a computational analysis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Here is the abstract:
Religious institutions’ engagement in prohibited electoral advocacy is a growing concern for democratic governance. In the United States, such mobilization has been especially visible within the evangelical movement. We examine this phenomenon using a corpus of 88,546 sermons from predominantly evangelical churches, transcribed from 63,683 h of Sunday services spanning the 2020, 2022, and 2024 election cycles and a nonelection control period. Analysis of this corpus reveals that direct political advocacy and endorsements are widespread: 14.7% of churches engaged in this speech during the three months surrounding the 2024 election. This behavior follows a clear electoral rhythm, peaking on the Sunday before Election Day, when 3.5% of churches mobilized. Geographic analysis indicates that advocacy correlates with county partisan composition but lacks strategic targeting; rates in swing states are indistinguishable from those in safe states. Our results provide large-scale quantification of political speech from American pulpits that constitutes prohibited electioneering under current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidelines, revealing a pattern of base mobilization driven by local partisan context rather than national electoral strategy.
Coverage: The Economist (subscription required).